Oct 092014

Posted by SnakeArbusto and greydogg, 99GetSmart

Written by Turkish political analyst / blogger, Gürkan Özturan:


Kobani in Syria’s Kurdish region has been resisting against ISIS for days, and in recent days the situation has been worsening due to ISIS advances. Civilians have been fleeing and taking refuge in Turkey; hundreds of thousands have been walking to the Turkish border, leaving everything behind. Across Turkey, there have been solidarity meetings with the participation of several political parties and civil society organizations. These rallies were being organized mainly by the Kurdish party HDP (Peoples’ Democratic Party). Rallies turned into protests and then turned violent. The result so far is a curfew declaration in six cities and – until this writing – 15 killed.

The “New Turkey”


Before the August 10 presidential election when Turkey voted on her president for the first time in history, the promise made by  President Erdoğan was of “the New Turkey” where the peace process would finally start blooming and bearing fruit to bring a peaceful end to the “Kurdish Question.” Democratic rights would be granted and economic expansion would prevail. Looking at the first 50 days of the New Turkey, one would not really see anything really new, except for a few new methods in violation of rights and liberties.

Border lock-down


When ISIS started its offensive against Kobani, people used their right to defend themselves and resist against a possibly massacre. Yet, many people had to flee from the region and run away from the marching IS gangs. In September, hundreds of thousands of people were mobilized. For over a week, Turkey did not allow the border to be crossed. Protests had started taking place back then. As there was no permission to let civilians in, there emerged protests in major metropolises and especially in the predominantly Kurdish cities. Finally on the 19th of September, Turkey opened the border to allow civilians fleeing from ISIS’s siege of Kobani to take refuge.

Permission to intervene

A week after the border was opened for controlled passes, there came the discussion to allow Turkish military to intervene in the situation, at which stage the street spirit changed form and turned into anti-war protests. On October 2nd, the Turkish parliament voted on the permission to allow Turkish soldiers to intervene in Iraq and Syria against ISIS. The HDP refused to vote Yes on the permission, alongside the Republican People’s Party CHP.

The irony in the permission is that currently the sides seem to have changed. When HDP organizes anti-ISIS protests and CHP silently seems to be approving of them, the Nationalist Movement Party MHP and ruling AKP have taken a stand against them, even though the latter two were the ones to approve military action by ground forces against ISIS gangs.

Night of Clashes


The night of October 7 saw a long night of drifting back to the darkness of the 1980s and 1990s. Protests against ISIS started turning violent. There started emerging images and videos of cars and buildings being set on fire, Turkish flags being burned and Ataturk busts being torn down. However these images appearing simultaneously on the media makes one feel that events are being staged – even more given the knowledge of prior cases where the National Intelligence Agency MIT agents were caught throwing Molotov cocktails and provoking protests to turn them violent.

Yet the violent images might have served a purpose, as several nationalist and Islamist radical groups have taken to the streets and started shooting at the protesters; especially after a piece of fake news stating that “the protesters are burning the Quran in the streets.”

Until the shootings it was the police handling the situation badly, and when more sides started clashing, then came curfew declarations and the military started marching into city centers in several cities in the East. This was not officially a declaration of martial law, or even a state of emergency. Yet, when tanks are marching on the streets, it does not take much to guess what it is; one does not need someone’s definition of the situation.

When anti-ISIS protesters were clashing with police forces on streets, pro-ISIS groups also took to the streets and started assaulting the other side. According to initial reports, around 15 people have been killed. And a dangerous declaration has been put in place today, calling for retaliation on the Islamist organizations in Turkey. In the 1990s, Hezbollah in Turkey had been used against the PKK and thousands of people had died in shadowy clashes. This time it started fast and Kurdish groups have declared they will resist.

Turkish Minister of Interior Affairs Efkan Ala also evaluated the protests and the violent surge. Ala declared that any type of violence will be met with multiplied violence. Ala also used the same method against the Gezi Park protests in 2013 when he was an adviser to the Prime Minister on security issues – after which he was appointed minister without being elected into parliament.

Media Blackout


Yet again, the Turkish media has surprised no one. While the clashes were taking place, and curfew was being declared in half a dozen cities and the number of deaths was climbing amid widespread protests and violent attacks by counter-protesters, Turkish TV channels were broadcasting entertainment shows, very much in line with the “penguin” patterns they have been carrying out during times of crises.

When there were protests in Egypt, the Turkish television channels were broadcasting live from across Egypt. When a coup took place, it was broadcast live in Turkey… The Turkish audience is allowed to watch all kinds of crisis situations and repression of rights live on TV – as long as it does not happen in Turkey.

If anything was shown at all, it portrayed all the protesters as “terrorists” who were targeting Turkish national unity and sovereignty. Yet the question was never raised as to why anyone who would demand the intervention of Turkish troops against ISIS be “attacking the Turkish nation.” And, second question, why do the police always manage to get hold of the people that shout slogans and fail to find the ones that carry out such attacks. The media are definitely being used for fueling the fire against Kobani-solidarity protests, serving as a tool of consent manufacturing. Given the number of Internet-literate people who critically get their news from social media, the media blackout seems to work in favor of the ones who are benefiting from the violence on Turkey’s streets.

Chaos Lobby


As earlier the Turkish government explained everything by mentioning… “lobbies,” the most recent uprisings in Turkey have been blamed on a “Chaos Lobby”. All state officials and ministers who appear on TV put the blame on a shady, non-existent organization that they call the “chaos lobby,” probably an advanced version of the “interest-rate lobby,” “terror lobby,” “social media lobby,” “porn lobby,” “judiciary lobby,” “marginal lobby,” “parallel lobby,” and so on…

More stories by Gürkan Özturan @ http://theradicaldemocrat.wordpress.com

More stories about Turkey @ http://99getsmart.com/category/turkey/

Did you like this? Share it:

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>